|
|
||||||||
Christian Worldview of History and Culture Found in Quotes From Supreme Court Justice, Joseph Story The real object of the First Amendment was not to coutenance, much less to advance Mohammedanism, Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity, but to exculde all rivalry among Christian sects and to prevent any national ecclesiastical patronage of the national government. Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison We are not to attribute this prohibition of a national religious establishment to an indifference to religion in general, and especially to Christianity(which none can hold in more reverence that the framers of the Constitution)... Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison Probably, at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, and of the Amendment to it now under consideration, the general, if not the universal, sentiment in America was, that Christianity ought to receive encouragement from the State so far as was not incompatible with the private rights of conscience and the freedom of religious worship. Quote from Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison Any attempt to level all religions, and to make it a matter of state policy to hold all in utter indifference, would have created universal disapprobation, if not universal indignation. Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison It yet remains a problem to be solved in human affairs, whether any free government can be permanent, where the public worship of God, and the support of religion, constitute no part of the policy or duty of the state in any assignable shape. Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison Christianity...is not to be maliciously and openly reviled and blasphemed against, to the annoyance of believers or the injury of the public... Quote from Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison It is unnecessary for us, however, to consider the establishment of a school or college, for the propagation of...Deism, or any other form of infidelity. Such a case is not to be presumed to exist in a Christian country... Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison Why may not laymen instruct in the general principle of Christianity as well as ecclesiastics...And we cannot overlook the blessings, which such men by their conduct, as well as their instructions, may, nay, must, impart to their youthful pupils. Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison Why may not the Bible, and especially the New Testament, without note or comment, be read and taught as a Divine Revelation in the [school] - its general precepts expounded, its evidences explained and its glorious principles of morality inculcated? Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison What is there to prevent a work, not sectarian, upon the general evidences of Christianity, from being read and taught in the college by lay teachers? It may well be asked, what is there in all this, which is positively enjoined, inconsistent with the spirit or truths of the religion of Christ? Are not these truths all taught by Christianity, although it teaches much more? Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison Where can the purest principles of morality be learned so clearly or so perfectly as from the New Testament? Quote from Joseph Story, appointed to the Supreme Court by President and founding father James Madison Temporary delusions, prejudices, excitements, and objects have irresistible influence in mere questions of policy. And the policy of one age may ill suit the wishes or the policy of another. The constitution is not subject to such fluctuations. It is to have a fixed, uniform, permanent construction. It should be, so far at least as human infirmity will allow, not dependent upon the passions or parties of particular times, but the same yesterday, to-day, and forever. Joseph Story, Supreme Court Justice
Joseph Story, Commenting on the Constitution (1790) There will probably be found few persons in this, or any other Christian country, who would deliberately contend, that it was unreasonable, or unjust to foster and encourage the Christian religion generally, as a matter of sound policy, as well as of revealed truth. In fact, every American colony, from its foundation down to the revolution, with the exception of Rhode Island, (if, indeed, that s...tate be an exception,) did openly, by the whole course of its laws and institutions, support and sustain, in some form, the Christian religion; and almost invariably gave a peculiar sanction to some of its fundamental doctrines. And this has continued to be the case in some of the states down to the present period, without the slightest suspicion, that it was against the principles of public law, or republican liberty.[1] Indeed, in a republic, there would seem to be a peculiar propriety in viewing the Christian religion, as the great, basis, on which it must rest for its support and permanence, if it be, what it has ever been deemed by its truest friends to be, the religion of liberty. – Justice Joseph Story, "Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States," |
|
|
||||||
|
rfpmccormick@gmail.com |